Prev: Antinuclear antibodies in healthy people and non-rheumatic diseases – diagnostic and clinical implicationsNext: The Art of Interpreting Antinuclear Antibodies (ANAs) in Everyday Practice

Record 045 · Review · 2019
Clinical relevance of HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescent patterns: the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) perspective
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · requested inclusion
“ICAP consensus paper on clinical relevance of 29 distinct HEp-2 IIFA patterns. Goes beyond binary positive/negative ANA to discuss titer/intensity and pattern-guided follow-up testing in the context of suspected disease.”
ICAP consensus paper on clinical relevance of 29 distinct HEp-2 IIFA patterns. Goes beyond binary positive/negative ANA to discuss titer/intensity and pattern-guided follow-up testing in the context of suspected disease. Candidate notes: HEp-2 IIFA provides titer/fluorescence intensity and patterns involving nucleus, cytoplasm, and mitotic cells—not only a dichotomous positive/negative result. Presents ICAP consensus on clinical relevance of 29 distinct HEp-2 IIFA patterns. Clinical relevance is defined primarily in the context of suspected disease and includes recommendations for follow-up testing. Intended to help clinicians use pattern information in daily practice and to inform diagnostic/classification criteria. Limits noted in the record: Full text paywalled here; findings from verified EuropePMC abstract (PMID 30862649). A positive ANA is not a diagnosis. Claims in this record are not verified.
A positive ANA is not a diagnosis. Claims in this record are not verified.
source
- ANA_pattern
- clinical_utility
- follow_up_tests
- interpretation
Review



